Claiborne Avenue Opportunities and Challenges

Reasons for Decline.

HANO mis-management

The primary cause of the economic decline of Claiborne Ave, north and south, is the same primary cause of many of the distressed neighborhoods in the city: Proximity to or being located between large scale, HANO run housing projects. Decades of HANO mismanagement, coupled with the City’s lack of interest in economic development that leads to jobs for its citizens that would move them out of subsidized housing and into the housing market has lead to precipitous decline in neighborhoods adjacent to HANO housing projects. This has played itself out on Jackson Ave, St. Bernard Ave, Orleans Ave, Basin Street and is the primary cause of the decline on both N. Claiborne, flanked as it is by the Lafitte and Iberville projects and S. Claiborne, sandwiched between the Magnolia and Calliope. Simply put, concentrating poverty and putting large communities of people without resources together has a tendency to suck the economic life out of an area.

Failure to incorporate interstate into land use plans.

Another missed opportunity was the failure to incorporate I-10 into longer term land use plans. We should have encouraged larger, private commercial development near the on and off ramps, using those exits as destinations and thereby encouraging much needed commercial development in the city, thereby capturing the jobs and tax revenue we’ve let escape to neighboring parishes.

Ways to enhance N. Claiborne

Markets

One of the ways we can bring economic life into the community adjacent to N. Claiborne is by using the shade and shelter provided by the elevated I-10 as an open air market from Orleans to St. Bernard, along the lines of the Portabello Road Market in London which sits under the freeway. Using the space under the bridge, lighting it attractively, providing  some soft material overhang to dampen highway traffic noise and setting up a system of market stalls along with a couple of permanent performance stages for local musicians. This area can be a focus of community activity, providing as it does, ample parking and a large swath of land for expansion.

Bus Transfer Station

The area under I-10 at Canal should be used for a Bus Transfer station. Move all of the current bus route termination points from their current locations at Canal & Rampart, Canal & Basin and Tulane & Loyola and centralize them to a Bus transfer station at Canal & Claiborne. Light it attractively, use soft awnings to minimize highway noise, fence the area to provide security, provide security, a driver break room & a small kiosk for the sale of magazines and cold drinks.

Larger commercial development

Rewrite zoning code to provide for opportunities for larger commercial development. Encourage retailers to locate there and make it easier to remove blighted buildings. Also make it easier to combine lots on adjacent streets so that larger parcels can be developed.

Ways to enhance S. Claiborne

Larger commercial development

Rewrite zoning code to provide for opportunities for larger commercial development. Encourage retailers to locate there and make it easier to remove blighted buildings. Also make it easier to combine lots on adjacent streets so that larger parcels can be developed.

Provide turning lanes

One of the major issues with S. Claiborne is traffic flow. Some of this could be mitigated by providing turning lanes, cut from the neutral ground that takes folks making left hand turns out of the flow of traffic. Also, reworking the overpass from the Northeast so that there are ramps to Earhart.

What removal of elevated I-10 means to the City at large.

Endless Gridlock on the Pontchartrain Expressway

The Pontchartrain Expressway to and from the west already carries close to 200,000 cars a day. At peak rush hours traffic will stack up back across the Crescent City Connection. Adding Eastbound I-10 traffic to that will likely increase it to a breaking point. And the Pontchartrain Expressway is prone to flooding at the railroad underpass.

Massive new interchange in Lakeview

As there isn’t currently a way to get from Westbound I-10 off the Pontchartrain Expressway to Eastbound 610 a massive new interchange will have to be built. Any discussion of removal of I-10 over Claiborne should include stakeholders in Lakeview.

Removing access to downtown hospitals.

We are in the process of building two brand new hospitals downtown, one of which will likely house our city’s trauma center. Currently they will sit next to the interstate which will provide speedy access from most parts of the city. Much of the city will be cut off from easy access to the new hospitals if we remove the interstate.

Endymion Saturday, Crescent City Classic, Rock And Roll Marathon.

I-10 provides a flyover of Canal Street and joins Uptown with Downtown when Endymion rolls on Saturday or any time Canal or Esplanade is blocked by a special event, such as parade or race.

Increased ground level traffic on Claiborne, Broad & Elysian Fields

With the I-10 handling over 100,000 cars a day, if a significant number of those are folks from points east looking to access downtown they will likely take Claiborne, Broad (Hwy 90) and Elysian Fields. Broad is currently very congested. Elysian Fields also is very busy at rush hours. And any extra traffic on surface level N. Claiborne is likely to make that street difficult to cross without a street light.

Increased congestion on Rampart and Canal and the CCC approaches.

As more traffic would be shifted to ground level more congestion would likely accumulate on Canal and Rampart. Also more congestion and traffic would be seen on Loyola, Carondelet and Tchoupitoulas exits of the CCC approach (Hwy 90) and these are exits that currently back up on to bridge approach most mornings.

Our transportation legacy and capacity

Given that a major part of our legacy, and hopefully our future, is with the transportation sector it seems hostile to our capacity and legacy and future to look to reduce our transportation links. We should look for ways to increase our capacity so that we can promote growth in the transportation sector, a key sector of our economy.

The future I-49

Hopefully, when I-49 is completed and can meet up with I-10 at the Superdome, it will provide a signature crossroads that we can all be proud of.

Unbuilding New Orleans East

Considering that the main effect of removal of I-10 would be to cut off New Orleans East from convenient downtown access, any and all discussions should involve New Orleans East. Actually, given that this road is used by the entire city, this discussion should be brought to the entire city.

Removal of roadway above flooding in a city where street flooding is an issue

Having gone through a host of planning where “storm-proofing” infrastructure was a major topic, it seems particularly foolish to consider removing a roadway always above base flood elevation and that provides a “dry” way out of a city that frequently floods from rain storms. The I-10 to the CCC (Hwy 90 ) provided a way out for many in downtown neighborhoods during Katrina. And this is particularly important as both I-10 West is prone to flooding at the railroad underpass, 610 isn’t raised along its entire length and I-10 East is prone to flooding by offshore winds from the East pushing water in the Bayou Sauvage area.

A personal tale

On May 8^th 1995, I was living in the Bayou St. John area, but when the skies opened up I was downtown rehearsing a production of Richard III. As the water rose in the Warehouse district and flooded the arts space, I had moved my truck to the sidewalk. After considering all routes I eventually found my way to the interstate. As I knew many of the low lying areas that stood in my path to home and receiving reports about flooding on Canal, Broad, parts of the French Quarter and other surface streets, and knowing that Esplanade was a ridge, I made my way up the elevated expressway and exited at Esplanade, encountering water at the bottom of the ramp but dry street once I got to the intersection with Esplanade. I drove up Esplanade to the Bayou, turned left, drove along the bayou until I got near my street. I waded home the block and a half, which was a lot closer than the miles I would have had to wade if the elevated I-10 hadn’t been there. It seems foolish to remove an elevated expressway that could be a conduit for first responders and a lifeline to the residents in a city that is prone to flooding during a strong spring rainstorm.

Suspicious Minds

Folks who have followed the “planning” attempts and processes have watched as certain ideas seem to gain currency, regardless of how unpopular they are, things like the “green dots” and other ideas for reducing our city’s capacity and population, while common sense ideas about growth have been ignored,  have made most folks suspicious of “planning” and “planners”

“New Urbanist” fashion.

Given that much of this mania to tear down the elevated expressway seems to be part and parcel of the “New Urbanist” fashion that is au currant in city planning it seems inadvisable to take a major step in reducing the capacity of our road system just because it falls in line with these “new urbanist” ideas that consistently ignore the actual urban reality of the city.

The Chief proponent.

Anyone who has followed the history of building roads in New Orleans, or almost any new project in New Orleans, finds that the chief opponent of moving the city towards a modern, robust, repopulated city is the chief proponent of removing the elevated I-10.

The preservationist mythology.

Much of the discussion surrounding this project has centered around the notion that if we make it difficult to access downtown then people will want to move downtown. This ignores the fact that much of the housing stock that makes up the area surrounding N. Claiborne and the elevated roadway is antiquated and of the type that modern New Orleans families have rejected for decades. Many of the preservationist proponents are dismissive of the needs of middle class families and hold out hope that those families are miraculously going to give up suburban living and bedroom doors that close to return to shotgun house living if we can just keep them from getting to their jobs. This attitude and the plans to remove the expressway impact significantly the middle class families of New Orleans East, families we should be working diligently to keep and whose lives we should be making more convenient.

Dave Dixon’s appearance does nothing to quell unease that “fix is in” on this study.

Since removal of the expressway ended up remaining in the city’s “Master Plan” despite vigourous protest, and given that Dave Dixon, who worked on the “master plan” for GoodyClancy seems to be involved in this effort, it give the appearance that “the fix is in” and that anything that comes out of this process is going to recommend removal regardless of what the real findings and concerns are. Many of us are remaining engaged despite this because these plans that continuously reduce our city’s capacity and undercut its ability to grow to the future are disturbing to those of us who feel that we need a strong city with increased capacity and focused primarily on growth.

And finally….

There are no magic oak trees. If oak trees made a street magic, Louisiana Ave would be a showplace, Washington Ave wouldn’t be depressed. We can’t make decisions about the future of New Orleans and whether it can be strong and grow based upon nostalgia for long-gone oak trees.

One of the things I have found missing from the post-Katrina recovery landscape is a unified media message about the importance of rebuilding and a sense that our efforts are being cheered on by our fellow citizens. I always thought that the World War II US propaganda poster was a good model for creating both a unified message and crafting a consensus. Some would be cautionary, others would exhort citizens to productive measures and still others would be of a celebratory or mission defining nature.

So, I started creating posters. They were on the previous incarnation of this website, and while some of them are clearly post-storm in their focus others tackle larger issues. Some of the issues of the previous posters have been settled for the most part.   Eventually, I’d like to get together a budget to produce these and bring them to the city.

Putting this site together has reminded me of the stuff I was writing in the immediate aftermath of Katrina and how those thoughts have either remained the same or evolved over the past 4 years. This was a letter to Congress that I personally delivered to all of the Senator’s offices (and tried to deliver to the House offices before being kicked out) along with a pair of Mardi Gras beads, in October of 2005. I assume that the House members got the message but I never heard from any of them.

Rebuild New Orleans and the Gulf Coast

Why should we help New Orleans?

Because New Orleans is still one of the most strategic cities in the country. Because New Orleans is the port by which the goods for the great mid section of the country go out to the world. Because it is the right thing to do. Because it is the economic engine which drives the economy of almost everything within a 100 miles of it. Because we have 400 miles of devastated coast from Ocean Springs, Mississippi to Orange, Texas and this is one of the largest natural disasters to hit the United States and if the Federal Government can’t or won’t respond then it will be seen as some sign of the United States ineffectiveness in dealing with its own problems. If you can’t do it for love of a great city and region, do it for pride in a great country

Is rebuilding the Gulf Coast something that the Federal Government should be involved in?

If not the U.S. Federal government then who? We are still part of the U.S. We still pay taxes. We live in a place that might be a little more hazardous, doing jobs that other folks might not want to do (like loading ships and refining oil) so that the country can trade with the world and have energy to operate.

One of the basic responsibilities of government is protection and mutual aid. If the Federal Government can’t even participate at that basic level then why be a country at all. If we have to assist other regions in their disasters and not get the same courtesy then why even be part of the U.S? If you weren’t going to help rebuild our city then why did you buy us from the French. The U.S. bought New Orleans and got Iowa (and 10 or so other states) for free. I’d say we were well worth the price and well worth fixing now that we have a bit of trouble.

But isn’t New Orleans and the Gulf Coast just one of those places that humans shouldn’t be living?

This country was built by people who lived in places where it was hard to live. If our forefathers hadn’t done the hard work of living in places that were hard to live in most of us would still be in Europe. There is no place in this country that is completely safe from natural disasters. San Francisco, Los Angeles and the west coast is awaiting an earthquake. No one suggested we write off Florida and return it to the Seminoles after the 4 hurricanes that swept through it last year. Oklahoma and other parts of tornado alleys have small town regularly wiped off the map. Even Nashville, TN, with some of the most benign weather in the country had a tornado hit its downtown a couple years ago.

We have the technology that the original settlers couldn’t have even imagined in protecting the places we live from natural disasters. We can rebuild the levee system, move the pumping stations to the lake for greater perimeter control and keep the city from storm surge flooding. They are doing it in the Netherlands. Are we less committed to one of the most strategic cities in the country than the Dutch are to their cities?

Can you put this in a way I can tell to my constituents that will make them realize how important New Orleans is to the nation?

If a tornado hits a small town and all that is destroyed is the bar then everyone breathes a sigh of relief and while there is some detoxing from the winos, life goes on. However, if that same tornado hits the general store, or the grocery store or the feed store or all three and the grain silo then people are in a world of hurt and everyone tries to figure out what they can do. I am frustrated that folks just think it hit the bar. The place where people go to have a good time and… well, they can go to Vegas instead. No! It hit the grain silo. The place where all those mid-western farmers that ship the grain down on barges to get loaded onto ocean going tankers bound for the rest of the world. It hit the general store. A large port that imported steel and rubber and other materials from around the world for US manufacturing. It hit the grocery store. New Orleans is one of the largest coffee ports in the country and had some of the largest roasting and packaging facilities. Gulfport, MS is one of the largest banana ports in the country. Everyone wants to focus on the French Quarter but there is so much more to the city than that.

Who are you and why are you doing this?

I’m Anthony Favre. Just a guy from New Orleans. Normally I work on Conventions in New Orleans. (Antonin Scalia might not remember me but I just did the sound and lights for the 5th Judicial Conference this spring at the Sheraton in New Orleans), but there aren’t many conventions in town and I was in the neighborhood and figured I’d let Congress know how important it was to get Rebuilding and Recovery money down to the Gulf Coast. I’m 4th Generation New Orleanian in ways that I count, Great Grandpa Ciaccio from Sicily, probably more than 4 in ways I don’t (like my grandfather’s mother was a Brunet, a French Family that has been around the city for centuries). On the Gulf Coast, one side of my dad’s family has been there since the French got off the boat and the other side, being Choctaw and all, was there before that. My dad grew up in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi and my cousins were living all over the coast.

What about corruption and incompetence?

You want oversight? I want oversight. I think we have a couple of people in our current governor and mayor who aren’t out to enrich themselves and are working as hard as they can to make it right. Also, don’t you think we learned a powerful lesson with this storm that the state of our local government matters? Don’t you think we will be watching out for what officials do at all levels of government? But, if it makes you feel better to have someone trustworthy and respected doing the auditing of the funds, then it’s alright with me.

But your representatives put in things like alligator farms in their bill. What about that?

At least we didn’t ask for something really silly like a snow shoe repair facility or a ski lift. Yeah, it’s a little extreme but, I know it seems exotic but an alligator farm in Louisiana is something that people actually do for a living. And everyone knows that if you don’t ask for something in Congress you will not get it. Don’t be irritated at us for asking. And if this seems a little excessive to you, don’t fund it. We still have many, many other things that were destroyed in our 400 miles of storm ravaged coast.

Oh, and your (governor, mayor, paper) said bad things about our (FEMA director, admiral, president) and we are irritated…

People get frustrated when they are in a desperate, life and death, situation. They say things they probably shouldn’t. It would be extremely petty to hold that against an entire region.

What are you gonna do if we don’t help you out?

We are going to do what we can. We will try to fix our houses and move on with our lives. But it will be tough. And without the money to fix the flood protection and the coastal erosion it is going to be tougher still to get anyone interested in helping us rebuild.

How do we pay for this?

A couple of years ago, back when there was a surplus, Congress passed a bill that provided tax cuts to people getting dividends and capital gains. Well, now that a lot of things are going on the National Credit Card, it might be time to look again and see if that was such a good idea

What kind of things do you think would help?

A Category 5 levee system built in 5 years. The extension of Interstate 49 speeded up to help with evacuations. Some help with paying the NOPD and other police forces in the region. Coastal erosion help.

Anything else you want to tell us?

Yes.. Please hurry. The entire tax base of Orleans, St. Bernard and Plaquamines Parish, as well as Hancock County, Mississippi has been destroyed. These folks can’t meet payroll for essential public services. We need some short term help and long term rebuilding, and we need to start this process as soon as we can.

Also.. it’s my home and I love it. Don’t make me move from my home. I might be really irritated and end up in your district.

In the days following Hurricane Katrina, the levee failures and the subsequent flooding there was lots of talk amoungst the uneducated about abandoning New Orleans and not rebuilding. Unfortunately for the city one of these fools was the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Dennis Hastert.

Smarter people prevailed, but the persistent notion of not rebuilding found its way into conversations that continued into 2006. The Bring New Orleans Back Committee (BNOB) in conjunction with the Urban Land Institute floated this idea and it proved to be some of the most contentious meetings in the post-Katrina landscape. 2006 was simply too early to discuss the viability of neighborhoods.  This conversation needs to happen now, but that is a whole ‘nother topic.

I feel that the infamous “Green Dot” debate stalled the impetus towards recovery in many of our neighborhoods. And it also gave rise to the premise of New Orleans as a “boutique city”.

The “Boutique City” was the idea that New Orleans was going to have fewer people and be happy about it. That those fewer people would be richer, probably, and therefore, theoretically shop at boutiques.

The concept of the “boutique city” and the fight against the concept, probably led in part to Ray Nagin’s infamous and divisive  “Chocolate City” remarks. Ironic, since it was his BNOB committee that pushed the concept forward and gave it its audience.

Well, the “boutique city” is a mistake.

It ignores the geographic strength of our location and exchanges it for the concept that we can live on our “charm”.  It is a concept that says not only will New Orleans not work to it’s potential but will deliberately short circuit progress to ensure that it is unable to thrive.

It is a failed vision, and unfortunately it is something we have been heading towards with each development that puts parks over productivity, quaintness over commerce, preservation over progress.

We should aim for a city that has a million hard working people all with good jobs. A city that attracts people on the basis of economic opportunity and holds onto its college graduates. A city that uses it’s geographic advantage astride the Mississippi River to create the growth necessary to sustain the city and its institutions.

Cause here’s the story. The investments necessary to protect New Orleans from the hazards of water are so costly that they will only be feasible if there are good financial reasons to do it. Being a major port with a population that has great jobs that is a vital player in the national and global economy is a good financial reason. Spending that money to protect a bunch of old buildings and unproductive folks either living on government assistance or on the money of their great-grandfather’s labor, is not a good financial reason.

Put simply: The “Boutique City”, in addition to being an enourmous waste of our city’s potential, will surely fail to be able to protect itself because the resources will not be allocated simply because we are striving to make ourselves “quaint” and “charming”.

The “Boutique City” pretty much guarantees we end up the next Atlantis. Growth and demonstrated financial strength and a critical and vital population means that we can live on perpetually.

The small airport satisfaction  rankings are out and it is no surprise that Louis Armstrong New Orleans International is near the bottom of the list.  You can check them out here. ( http://www.jdpower.com/travel/ratings/airport-ratings/small/sortcolumn-1/ascending/page-#page-anchor ) The only airport with lower ratings is San Jose (SJC), which lacks jetways for half its concourses and reminded me of a used plane sales lot the last time I flew through it.

The issues with Armstrong are fairly evident to anyone who has ever flown through it. It is inconsistent across the concourses with some very modern and well designed (C & D) and others horribly dated (B). The baggage claim for the majority of carriers is in need of significant updating. The passenger pickup area is a dirty and dank cave. The food is generally bad and the kiosks providing most food and drink have inconsistent quality and service and hours that don’t meet the needs of all the travelers particularly those leaving very early or arriving late.

The current Louis Armstrong International Airport (MSY) is an outdated airport. It needs to be updated to remain viable. Expansion would be difficult due to jurisdictional conflicts between the City of New Orleans, City of Kenner, Jefferson Parish and St. Charles Parish.

There has been talk for decades about building a new airport to either compliment or supplant MSY, in New Orleans East or between Baton Rouge and New Orleans.

I’d like to take this opportunity to suggest another option.

Revamp Lakefront Airport as a new international airport.

With the airport designation NEW, New Orleans Lakefront Airport is an overlooked asset for the city. And since the creation of a new airport is a time consuming and arduous process, we should focus on revamping Lakefront and expanding it to handle international service.   Give incentives to international carriers to come into the market by giving them breaks on landing fees.

It’s location on a man-made peninsula on Lake Pontchartrain means that it could be expanded without using  already occupied land. With a new connector road in the corridor between Downman road and the Industrial Canal the airport would be minutes from downtown. It’s position next to the Industrial Canal and with a major rail link backing up to the property makes it a natural for inter-modal transportation opportunities.

Then we could move most of the national carriers that also handle international flights (Continental, Delta, American, United, etc) to the new airport, leaving MSY to handle carriers that don’t have international flights (Southwest, JetBlue, etc)   This is a model used successfully by cities like Houston (Hobby and IAH), Washington (DCA and IAD), Dallas (Love and DFW) and the Bay Area (SFO and Oakland) to grow their airlinks.  Build the New Airport with expanded cargo facilities and make a significant attempt to lure cargo flights from Miami, Memphis, Atlanta and Dallas. It’s position next to the Industrial Canal and with a major rail link backing up to the property makes it a natural for inter-modal transportation opportunities. Connect the new airport to rail lines that run directly to the port facilities.

This new airport and an expanded list of direct air connections are essential for the goal of being involved with the business of international trade and would also enhance our ability to attract both visitors and new businesses.

Revamping Lakefront Airport (NEW) as the new New Orleans International Airport positions our city to truly take advantage of our geographic location and enhance our position as Gateway to the Americas.  And the world.